24 Jul 2024
Saturday 14 March 2015 - 09:32
Story Code : 155368

European officials criticize Republican letter to Iran

[caption id="attachment_154701" align="alignright" width="158"]FILE - In this Nov. 4, 2014 file photo, then-Sen.-elect Tom Cotton, R-Ark.  waves at his election watch party in North Little Rock, Ark., after defeating incumbent Sen. Mark Pryor. Forty-seven Republican senators warned Monday that any agreement the Obama administration strikes with Iran to limit Tehran's nuclear program may be short-lived unless Congress approves the deal. In an open letter to Iranian leaders, Cotton and 46 other Republicans said that without congressional approval, any deal between Iran and the U.S. would be merely an agreement between President Barack Obama and Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. (AP Photo/Danny Johnston, File) FILE - In this Nov. 4, 2014 file photo, then-Sen.-elect Tom Cotton, R-Ark. waves at his election watch party in North Little Rock, Ark., after defeating incumbent Sen. Mark Pryor[/caption]

European allies are joining the Obama administration in criticizing Republican congressional interjection into nuclear negotiations with Iran, saying that an open letter from Republican senators to Iranian leaders has been counterproductive and comes at a particularly sensitive time in the talks.

Suddenly, Iran can say to us: Are your proposals actually trustworthy if 47 senators say that no matter what the government agrees to, we can subsequently take it off the table? German Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier said during a visit to Washington.

This is no small matter were talking about, Steinmeier warned in remarks at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. This is not just an issue of American domestic politics.

Germany, France and Britain, along with Russia and China, are U.S. negotiating partners in the Iran talks.

Meanwhile, Irans supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei,took aim at Washington,saying that political divisions in the United States made Iranian negotiators question the Obama administrations ability to follow through with any agreement.

Of course I am worried, because the other side is known for opacity, deceit and backstabbing, Ayatollah Khamenei said Thursday, according to Irans Mehr News Agency.

European allies are alarmed by U.S. political tensions on a host of foreign policy issues.

President Obamahas so far resisted demands from a bipartisan congressional majority to send lethal military equipment to Ukraine. Germany and France, which helped negotiate a sputtering cease-fire between the Ukrainian government and Russian-backed separatists, have said Western arms shipments would only escalate the conflict and undermine a possible solution.

Republicans, in turn, have struck back at European criticism. Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Tex.) said that what he considered U.S. and European capitulation to Iran was reminiscent of Western appeasement of Adolf Hitler.

I believe we are at a moment like Munich in 1938, Cruz said on the Hugh Hewitt radio show on Thursday.

Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) extended the World War II metaphor to Ukraine in a direct attack on Steinmeier.The foreign minister of Germany is the same guy that refuses, in his government, to enact any restrictions on the behavior of [Russian President] Vladimir Putin, who is slaughtering Ukrainians as we speak. He has no credibility.

Steinmeier, McCain said, is in the Neville Chamberlain school of diplomacy, a reference to the British prewar prime minister who signed the 1938 Munich agreement conceding the Sudetenland region of Czechoslovakia to Hitlers Germany.

Secretary of State John F. Kerry told lawmakers Wednesday that the letter to Iran by 47 Republican senators risks undermining the confidence that foreign governments in thousands of important agreements commit to. It purports to tell the world that if you want to have any confidence in your dealings with America, they have to negotiate with 535 members of Congress.

The letter warned Iran that any nuclear agreement signed by Obama could be revoked by the stroke of a pen by any future president, and that Congress could modify its terms at any time.

Some of the letters backers have sought political cover as they were flooded with broad-based rebukes.

On Friday, one signer, Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) told Bloomberg journalists that he now questions the decision to address the letter to Irans leaders.

I suppose the only regret is who its addressed to, Johnson said. But the content of the letter .?.?. none whatsoever.

Obama further added to the White House backlash in comments reported Friday: I am embarrassed for the letter signers, he was quoted as saying.

For them to address a letter to the ayatollah who, they claim, is our mortal enemy and their basic argument to them is: Dont deal with our president because you cant trust him to follow through on an agreement, Obama said in an interview with Vice media that is expected to be released Monday, according to the AFP news agency.

Earlier this week, Vice President Biden called the letter a highly misleading signal to
friend and foe alike that our commander-in-chief cannot deliver on Americas commitments a message that is as false as it is dangerous.

Kerry and the other negotiators will meet with Iranian officials next week in Lausanne, Switzerland, for another round of talks.

The administration has said aframework for a dealmust be agreed to by the end of this month if technical details are to be completed before the negotiating deadline at the end of June. Negotiators have said that deadline will not be extended.

U.S. and European officials have cited recent progress in the negotiations, while cautioning that a deal may not be possible. Outstanding issues are said to include the future status of Irans underground nuclear-enrichment facility at Fordow, near the city of Qom, and aspects of Irans nuclear research and development program.

Obama has said the goal is to block Irans path to a nuclear weapon in a lasting and verifiable way. Opponents have insisted that Irans nuclear capability which Tehran says is designed only for legitimate, peaceful energy purposes must be destroyed.

Even before Steinmeiers visit on Thursday, Germany, Britain and France had repeatedly expressed concern about congressional interference in the talks. Ambassadors from the three Western European countries have been a frequent presence on Capitol Hill, trying to persuade lawmakers to hold off on new Iran sanctions or any other legislation related to the negotiations while they are underway.

Following publication of the letter Sunday night, French Ambassador Gerard Araud, a diplomat of long experience in this country and a prolific user of social media, posted a Twitter link to the letter and his own comment that for a foreigner, Washington can be full of surprise.

In London on Tuesday, British Foreign Secretary Philip Hammond told a parliamentary committee that new legislation on Iran could become a spanner in the works and have an unpredictable effect on leadership opinion and public opinion in Tehran.

By Washington Post
Your Name
Your Email Address